|
| Posted on 3/30/09 at 12:31 PM | |
|
Chris: I knew as soon as I posted that this was going to come back...and I almost didn't write anything because who needs to argue? Well I guess the big problem here is that we're just going to disagree....as you didn't see my original point...nor do you see what I'm talking about now. For someone who doesn't normally print with a non-phthalate ink, which is what the original post was about...and is just going to use it for one or two jobs...there are some hidden steps, costs and expense. That's what I was trying to convey to help the guy out. I wasn't complaining at all. Again, we'd love to completely switch to non-phthalate inks...but at this time it's just not in the cards. There are too many other factors that are involved for this to happen at this time for us. And yes, one of them is the expense. I'm not "crying" about the cost...but at TF's sales level it is a considerable factor to switch to this type of ink. Researching and reflecting on the cost...that's just good business sense. For the record, we are selling and promoting non-phthalate ink...as well as recycled RPET t-shirt blanks and other eco-friendly sales avenues. My issue is the twisting of what I've posted either intentional or not, based on your un-informed opinion of how my company operates. I guess I have to respect that your stance may be different from mine, and that's ok with me. So I guess moving forward, I'll try to do a better job of respecting your point of view, if you'll see mine as well. -M ____________________ Marshall | ||
  
|
